Tandoc and Thomas’ article on “The ethics of web analytics” was a good transition after reading articles about how deceptive the Facebook is. However, whether the Facebook can be considered as journalism still remains.
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Ethics
Facebook conducted a study, which manipulated
users’ emotional state. More negative News Feeds led to more negative status
messages, as more positive News Feeds led to positive statuses. Not to mention
their mal use of the tools, it seriously challenges ethical issues. Even though
some might refer this study as original, ethically, it’s an open question. Morality
comes before any legality. We make regulations/laws out of ethical reasons. Somewhat contrary to their findings, there
have been studies indicating the more users see other people being happy, the
more they feel depressed and less happy.
The Facebook has always been
manipulating users’ News Feeds. It uses an algorithm to determine what to
display and hide, and it rarely discloses any detailed information about how the
algorithm works. This is why I don’t use Facebook.
Tandoc and Thomas’ article on “The ethics of web analytics” was a good transition after reading articles about how deceptive the Facebook is. However, whether the Facebook can be considered as journalism still remains.
Tandoc and Thomas’ article on “The ethics of web analytics” was a good transition after reading articles about how deceptive the Facebook is. However, whether the Facebook can be considered as journalism still remains.
Labels:
HJ
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment