Pew's fact sheet suggests that in 2014 The New York
Times and The Wall Street Journal had a similar
number of users who paid for access to the websites (more than 700,000). The Boston Globe and Los Angeles Times also
had a similar number of such users (around 60,000). However, I am interested in examining the
relationship between the type of paywall – metered or hard – and the growth in
digital subscribes. The New York Times, for example, uses a
metered paywall that allows online visitors to view a limited number of stories
for free before requiring a subscription. In the first quarter of 2015 the outlet
added around 33,000 net digital subscribers. Circulation revenue from
digital-only subscription was 46.1 million – an increase of 14.4% from the
first quarter of 2014. While this revenue accounts for about 20% of the total
circulation revenue, it allows The New York Times to earn more
revenue from paid circulation than from advertising. The newspaper has tried to
improve in engaging users to the point where they are willing to pay – for example,
by analyzing the last pages that users visited before signing up for a
subscription. I have not seen similar data about The Wall Street
Journal and other newspapers that use a hard paywall, but I am curious to see
whether and how the number of their digital subscribers has grown, and look at
their revenue from digital only subscriptions.
No comments:
Post a Comment