I
think that Lee (2013) made an important contribution to the uses and
gratifications theory, as she showed that different types of people have
different types of news motivations, and the latter can predict the consumption
of different news genres. Put differently, she offered useful answers to the
questions: who is using what type of news, and why? I was somewhat surprised
that information motivations did not strongly predict the use of Twitter and
that compared with Facebook it was consistently used more among those with
entertainment, opinion and social motivations. Has this possibly changed since
the study was conducted? A recent study by Pew (2015) suggested that "the
proportion of users who say they follow breaking news on Twitter… is nearly
twice as high as those who say they do so on Facebook (59% vs. 31%) – lending
support, perhaps, to the view that Twitter’s great strength is providing
as-it-happens coverage and commentary on live events". The study also
suggested that on both Twitter and Facebook, more users are getting news than
in the past.As
Webster (2014) pointed out, various theoretical approaches assume that people
have preexisting preferences that they bring to the media and this drives their
choices. However, these approaches "allow very little room for the
possibility that our encounters with media have other causes and that those
encounters might actually shape our preferences, reversing the traditional
direction of causation" (p. 14). I am wondering if and how our encounters
with social media have shaped our preferences.
Facebook Is Experimenting With How You Read The News
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/30/facebook-trending-experiment_n_7697852.html
Why nine publishers are taking the Facebook plunge
http://fortune.com/2015/05/13/facebook-buzzfeed-new-york-times/